For independent research sites & site networks

One operating layer for every active study, every coordinator.

TrialConnx gives site coordinators, regulatory leads, and PIs a real-time view of every study in startup: feasibility, budget, IRB, contracts, and activation. Stop coordinating the chaos in fourteen inboxes and a spreadsheet.

Sarah K. · CRC · Week of Mar 18 6 active · 2 in startup
Mon
Memorial · enrollment visit
IRB amendment · NCT-832
Pfizer feasibility call
Contract redline · Genentech
+4 unscheduled
Tue
SOV reconciliation
Site initiation · IQVIA
CRA monitoring · Coastal
+5 unscheduled
Wed
eReg binder updates
Patient screening
PI weekly
SAE follow-up
+6 unscheduled
Thu
Contract redline · Memorial
IRB submission · NCT-911
Sponsor Q&A
+5 unscheduled
Fri
Status round-up emails
Activation review · Coastal
Friday catch-up
+7 unscheduled
27 unscheduled tasks this week: sponsor questions, contract chases, IRB follow-ups. Most won’t make the calendar.

The honest answer

A coordinator’s week is the bottleneck.

Site startup isn’t slow because of one missing form. It’s slow because every active study competes for the same forty hours of coordinator time, and no one has a real-time view of what’s actually due, in flight, or stuck.

Sponsor portals, IRB portals, eRegulatory binders, sponsor emails, and internal Slack all become parallel inboxes for the same work. Status only exists in someone’s head.

The fix isn’t more coordinator hours. It’s one operating view of the work, so capacity, blockers, and slips are visible before they become emergencies.

What changes

Six things site teams can do with TrialConnx that they can’t do today.

Six concrete capabilities address the gaps that emerge when one site runs many studies in parallel.

Every active study, in one view

See the full study portfolio by stage, owner, aging, and blocker without three open tabs.

Filter by sponsor, coordinator, stage, or aging signal. Spot the studies that need attention before the next Monday standup.

FeasBudgetContractIRBSIVActive State
NCT-832 Onc IRB · 18d
NCT-911 Cardio Contract · 22d
NCT-208 Endo Active
NCT-654 Neuro stuck 34d
Coordinator hours
5.6hrs/wk
Saved per coordinator

Time previously spent assembling cross-study status updates, chasing email threads, and rebuilding context.

Site case study (anonymized)

Sponsor handoff visibility

See who owes whom what, and when, across every sponsor portal and email thread. Stop chasing status with three follow-up emails.

Real-time IRB packet status

Every IRB submission, where it sits, what came back. Aging surfaces before the cycle gets long.

Coordinator turnover
23%
Reduction at high-volume sites

When the system holds the institutional knowledge, coordinator turnover stops resetting study state.

Site case study (anonymized)
From the case study “

We stopped losing studies to coordinator turnover. The system holds the context: sponsor history, regulatory state, and who owns what. When someone leaves, the work doesn’t restart from scratch.

Anonymized site case study

Signs the gap is real

The hidden cost of coordinating chaos.

If your site looks like the numbers below, the bottleneck isn’t your coordinators. It’s the absence of a shared operating layer.

27%
Annual coordinator turnover at high-volume sites
Tufts CSDD, 2024
18hrs/wk
Per coordinator on status updates and email triage
ACRP Workload Survey, 2023
2 of 5
Coordinators report burnout within 18 months
SCRS Site Climate Survey, 2024
31%
Of activation slips trace back to coordinator capacity, not protocol issues
Site case study (anonymized)

What each role sees

One operating layer, three views of the same work.

Coordinators, site directors, and PIs each need a different cut of the same study data. Not three different systems.

For the Coordinator

See your week, not fourteen inboxes.

  • Real-time queue across every active study
  • Sponsor handoffs surface before they slip
  • One contract / IRB / regulatory inbox
  • Context preserved across handoffs and PTO
For the Site Director

Forecast capacity before you say yes to the next study.

  • Weekly coordinator load at a glance
  • Cross-study aging and bottleneck patterns
  • Activation forecast based on actual cycle times
  • Sponsor scorecard data without manual rollup
For the PI

Know your studies’ status without a meeting.

  • Per-study state without scheduling a sync
  • Slip prediction 7-10 days before activation
  • Approvals queued in one place for batch signoff
  • Focus time protected with fewer daily status standups

See how TrialConnx fits your site’s startup workflow.

Bring your active study list, sponsor mix, and coordinator team. We’ll show how the operating layer can fit around the way your site already works, alongside your CTMS and sponsor portals.