
5 Study Startup Metrics That Actually Predict Delays
Stop measuring milestone dates. Start tracking the hidden bottlenecks that cause 80% of trials to miss enrollment timelines.
Time to First Patient, a monthly note for teams running study startup. Subscribe

Stop measuring milestone dates. Start tracking the hidden bottlenecks that cause 80% of trials to miss enrollment timelines.

Study startup turns a protocol into a live, recruiting study. It includes feasibility, site selection, contract & budget negotiation, IRB/EC approvals, and site initiation visits—ending at site activation. Teams using modern, parallelized workflows (AI site selection, virtual SIVs, e-regulatory) compress timelines from 6–8 months to roughly 8–12 weeks.
While spreadsheets work for simple tracking, clinical trial complexity demands more. See the latest data on efficiency gaps, hidden costs, and when to upgrade to purpose-built systems.

Top quartile sites respond to feasibility surveys in 3-5 days vs 15+ days for bottom quartile. Discover the proven two-phase approach that cuts response times in half while maintaining accuracy and sponsor satisfaction.

See how a structured SOP transforms chaotic startup processes into sponsor-ready workflows that activate studies 30% faster.

If you’ve ever wondered why that promising clinical trial took six months to activate when everyone thought it would take six weeks, you’re not alone.